Language: ENDiscuss a SystemDiscuss
WORK · AI + EDGE · AGRICULTUREPILOT

AI + Edge Agriculture

Field sensors and edge inference feeding irrigation and crop-condition decisions, buffered through intermittent connectivity, with an agronomist approving every change before it reaches the field.

SYSTEM RECORDCS-02
INDUSTRY
Agriculture · irrigated field crops
SYSTEMS
Edge & Connected · AI Agents
SCOPE
One farm, two fields, one growing season
OWNER
Head agronomist (client)
STAGE
Assess → Pilot (current) → Engineer → Operate
MEASUREMENT
Agreed baseline; period in progress
01

Operational Context

A family-run farm growing irrigated field crops across two fields with different soil profiles. Irrigation is scheduled by the head agronomist from experience, weather forecasts and manual soil checks taken while walking the field.

The farm has patchy mobile coverage, no fixed network in the field, and a small team for whom any new system has to save time on day one or it will not be used.

02

Problem

Soil and canopy conditions were read by hand, at most once a day, in a few spots. Irrigation decisions lagged the weather by a day or more. When a decision was wrong there was no record of what had been seen or why it had been made, so nothing could be learned from it.

03

Business Consequence

Water and energy are spent on the schedule rather than the need. Under-watering in one zone and over-watering in another in the same week was common. The agronomist’s time was spent collecting readings rather than interpreting them.

COST
Water, pumping energy, agronomist hours
RISK
Yield variance between zones; stress events noticed late
EVIDENCE
None retained: decisions were not recorded
04

Constraints

The constraints shaped the architecture more than the technology did.

CONNECTIVITY
Intermittent 4G only. The system must keep working offline for days.
POWER
Solar and battery at the gateway; low-power sensors.
AUTHORITY
No automated actuation. The agronomist approves every change.
ADOPTION
One screen, in the field, usable with wet hands.
DATA
Farm data stays with the farm; aggregated only with consent.
05

Previous System

A paper notebook, a weather app, and a manual irrigation controller programmed weekly. The notebook held the knowledge; the controller held the schedule; nothing connected them.

06 · 07

System Design & Architecture

The system is one loop: sense the field, process locally, forward when the link allows, compare against the field’s own history, propose a schedule, and wait for the agronomist. AI is one bounded component that reads and proposes. It cannot actuate.

Edge-first by necessity: threshold alerts and data buffering run on the gateway so the farm has the same information on a day with no signal as on a day with full coverage.

Architecture: FIELD · PHYSICAL, CLOUD · DIGITAL, PEOPLE · ACTION. Sequence: SENSORS (Soil moisture, canopy temp, weather; LORA · 15 MIN), then EDGE DEVICE (Field gateway; EDGE LINUX · LOCAL RULES), then TELEMETRY (Buffered uplink; MQTT · 4G · STORE & FORWARD), reached over an async, buffered link, then CLOUD / DATA (Field record · history; TIME SERIES · ASSET DB), then AI AGENT (Irrigation proposal; READ · PROPOSE · NO ACTUATE), then AGRONOMIST (Approves or edits; OWNER · ONE CLICK PAUSE), a human approval gate, then ACTION (Schedule to controller; LOGGED · OBSERVED).

ARCHITECTURE · CS-02
  1. SENSORS
    Soil moisture, canopy temp, weather
    LORA · 15 MIN
  2. EDGE DEVICE
    Field gateway
    EDGE LINUX · LOCAL RULES
  3. TELEMETRY
    Buffered uplink
    MQTT · 4G · STORE & FORWARD
  4. CLOUD / DATA
    Field record · history
    TIME SERIES · ASSET DB
  5. AI AGENT
    Irrigation proposal
    READ · PROPOSE · NO ACTUATE
  6. AGRONOMIST
    Approves or edits
    OWNER · ONE CLICK PAUSE
  7. ACTION
    Schedule to controller
    LOGGED · OBSERVED
08

Human Responsibility

The head agronomist owns the system. Every irrigation change is approved by a person, every approval and edit is logged, and the agent can be paused from the same screen.

Who owns each decision, and what the system may do
DECISIONWHOSYSTEM MAY
Change an irrigation scheduleHEAD AGRONOMISTPropose a schedule with the readings and reasoning that led to it
Respond to a stress alertAGRONOMIST ON DUTYRaise the alert with location, trend and a suggested check
Pause or resume the agentHEAD AGRONOMISTNothing. The pause is a human control.
Share aggregated data externallyFARM OWNERNothing without written consent
09

Engineering

Sensors report over LoRa to a solar-powered field gateway running Edge Linux. Local rules handle thresholds and buffering; MQTT with store-and-forward carries events to the cloud when the 4G link is up. Cloud services keep the field record and time series, and the agent runs against them on a schedule and on new data.

ASSESS
3 weeks: field walk, interviews, sensor placement plan, baseline definition
PILOT BUILD
6 weeks: sensors, gateway, telemetry, field record, agent, approval screen
PILOT RUN
One growing season, in progress
10

Reliability

Designed for the days the link is down.

OFFLINE
Gateway buffers up to 30 days of readings; local alerts continue
REPLAY
Ordered, deduplicated forwarding when the uplink returns
HEALTH
Battery, signal and heartbeat per device; alert to the agronomist if silent
FALLBACK
If the agent is unavailable, the previous approved schedule stands
SECURITY
Per-device credentials; TLS gateway to cloud
11

Measurement

A baseline was agreed before the pilot started. Results will be reported against it when the season closes; nothing is reported before then.

PRIMARY
Water applied per hectare vs. prior season, same crop
SECONDARY
Agronomist hours on data collection; stress events noticed within 24 h
QUALITY
Proportion of proposals approved without edit
BASELINE
Prior season records and the first four weeks of the pilot
12

Results

The pilot is in its measurement period. Figures will be published here against the agreed baseline when the season closes. Until then, only qualitative observations are reported.

  • PRIMARY OUTCOME
    Measurement in progress
    Reported at season close against the agreed baseline.
  • OBSERVED SO FAR
    Decisions now have a record
    Every proposal, approval and edit is logged with the readings behind it.
  • OBSERVED SO FAR
    Field data survives the link
    Multiple multi-day outages with no data loss.
Stacx24 does not publish percentages or ROI figures that have not been measured against an agreed baseline.
13

Current Status

PILOTSTATUS AS OF OCT 2026

Pilot live across two fields. The approval screen is in daily use. Hardening and the production handover are planned after the season closes and the results are reviewed with the farm.

PRODUCTION
Running in the client’s operation, measured, supported.
PILOT
One bounded system, live, with a baseline and an agreed measurement period.
EARLY DEPLOYMENT
In use, still being hardened; measurement period not yet complete.
TECHNICAL DEMONSTRATION
Built to prove an approach. Not operating a real workload.
CONFIDENTIAL CLIENT
Operating; client and figures withheld at their request.
FOUNDER-LED PRIOR WORK
Delivered by Stacx24 founders before the company; shown for method, not as company track record.
14

Technologies

Listed by layer. The system is the product; these are its components.

SENSE
  • Soil moisture probes
  • Canopy temperature
  • Weather station
EDGE
  • LoRa
  • Field gateway
  • Edge Linux
  • Local rules
TRANSPORT
  • MQTT
  • TLS
  • Store & forward
  • 4G
CLOUD
  • Time-series store
  • Field record
  • Ingestion
INTELLIGENCE
  • Irrigation agent
  • Baseline comparison
  • Evaluation set
PEOPLE
  • Approval screen
  • Pause control
  • Audit log
NEXT STEP

Have a similar operation?

Describe it as it runs today. We will tell you whether this system shape fits, and what would be different for you.